Skip to content
GERICLINICS

GeriQBank · Paper III · Q4

Assessment of delirium

Moderate YieldAsked ×17-mark note
Chapter
Delirium
Years asked
Not recorded in the source
Frequency
Set 1× in Paper III (2009–2025)

As set in the university paper

  • Assessment of delirium.

    Paper III · Cognition, Dementia & Delirium · asked ×1 · 7-mark note · see in paper list

Answer framework

  1. Principles — screening versus diagnosis; why delirium is missed; anchor on attention, awareness and consciousness
  2. Diagnostic criteria — DSM-5; ICD-10; Kane's three questions
  3. Screening instruments — CAM and its algorithm; testing inattention and thinking; 3D-CAM; ultra-brief screens; CAM-ICU; screens for delirium on dementia; other tools and prediction models
  4. Frequency and clinical rules — how often to screen; no excuses for a positive item; when in doubt, assume delirium; what follows a positive screen
  5. Choosing a tool — CAM, 3D-CAM, 4AT, UB-2, CAM-ICU, MDAS/DRS-R-98, E-PRE-DELIRIC
  6. Recent updates — NICE 2023 and the 4AT; APA 2025; pre-discharge assessment; under-coding; ICD-11; India

An exam answer plan drawn from the detailed answer below. Use it to attempt the question first.

Detailed answer

Pro · free in beta
Attempt it firstOutline your answer as a 7-mark note before revealing it — definition, causes, evaluation, management and the geriatric angle.Reveal answer

Short revision answer

  • Assessment has two steps: screening (a quick tool flags possible delirium) and diagnosis (full evaluation against DSM-5 or ICD-10) — a positive screen is not a diagnosis. Delirium is missed because the baseline is unknown, informants are absent, symptoms fluctuate, and hypoactive delirium looks like tiredness or depression. Anchor on attention, awareness and consciousness, not behaviour.
  • DSM-5: disturbed attention and awareness; developing over a short period as a change from baseline, fluctuating; an additional cognitive disturbance; not better explained by an established neurocognitive disorder or coma; evidence of a medical cause, substance or withdrawal. ICD-10 adds perceptual, psychomotor, sleep–wake and emotional disturbance. Kane's three questions: acute onset? physical factors? psychological factors?
  • CAM: (1) acute onset and fluctuation AND (2) inattention, PLUS (3) disorganised thinking OR (4) altered consciousness — sensitivity 94%, specificity 89%. Test attention with months or days backwards or digit span backwards, and thinking with orientation and the flow of ideas.
  • 3D-CAM (3 minutes): sensitivity 96% and specificity 86% with dementia, 93% and 96% without. Ultra-brief: "months backwards" alone (83%/69%), plus "day of the week" (UB-2, 93%/64%) — for ruling out only. CAM-ICU for intubated patients: the letter task (SAVEAHAART), any RASS other than 0, and yes/no questions.
  • Delirium on dementia: the best items are "what day of the week is it?", days backwards, "what type of place is this?" and "does the patient appear sleepy?" — highly sensitive but poorly specific, so good for ruling out. Many other tools exist (4AT, bCAM, DRS-R-98, MDAS); prediction tools include E-PRE-DELIRIC and SAPD.
  • Screen daily in hospital, weekly in post-acute care and monthly in long-term care, and whenever anyone reports a change. Never explain away a positive item (hospital, illness, age, analgesia, poor sleep); when in doubt — no informant, too drowsy to test — assume delirium. A positive screen leads to full evaluation: collateral and drug history, examination, targeted tests and the DELIRIUM IS VERY PAINFUL review.
  • Choosing: CAM (~5 min, the reference screen); 3D-CAM (3 min, structured, works with dementia); 4AT (<2 min, no training, works in drowsy patients — endorsed by NICE and SIGN); UB-2 (<1 min triage); CAM-ICU (2–3 min); MDAS/DRS-R-98 (10–20 min, severity); E-PRE-DELIRIC (predicts who will become delirious).
  • Updates: NICE CG103 (2023) and SIGN recommend the 4AT; APA 2025 requires validated screening of at-risk patients and assessment at care transitions (critics note it still doesn't mandate a pre-discharge check); delirium is under-coded as "toxic or metabolic encephalopathy"; ICD-11 keeps the same core features. India: ~0.4% of inpatients by referral versus ~30% of elderly ICU patients by screening (about 45% hypoactive) — so screen routinely.

Condensed by GeriClinics from the detailed answer below, with no new facts added.

18 High-Yield Points

A. Principles

1.

Assessment has two distinct steps: screening (a rapid bedside tool that flags possible delirium) and diagnosis (a full clinical evaluation against DSM-5 or ICD-10 criteria). A positive screen is not a diagnosis.

2.

Why delirium is missed: the cognitive baseline is often unknown; there may be no reliable informant; symptoms wax and wane, so one assessment can look completely normal hours later; and hypoactive delirium is quiet and easily mistaken for tiredness, depression or "just being old".

3.

Anchor the assessment on the core features — attention, awareness and level of consciousness — not on behaviour. This is the single most useful strategy when dementia coexists or when no informant is available.

B. Diagnostic criteria (gold standard)

4.

DSM-5: (i) disturbance of attention and awareness; (ii) develops over a short period, a change from baseline, with fluctuation during the day; (iii) an additional disturbance in cognition; (iv) not better explained by a pre-existing, established or evolving neurocognitive disorder and not occurring in coma; (v) evidence of an underlying medical condition, substance intoxication or withdrawal, or multiple aetiologies.

5.

ICD-10 criteria are similar but add detail on perceptual distortion (illusions, hallucinations), psychomotor disturbance, sleep–wake cycle disruption and emotional disturbance.

6.

Kane's practical three questions for any confused older patient: was the onset acute (hours to days)? Are there physical factors (illness, drugs, sensory deprivation)? Are there psychological factors (depression, psychosis) contributing?

C. Screening instruments (Pathy list)

7.

Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) — the most widely used. Four features: (i) acute onset and fluctuating course; (ii) inattention; (iii) disorganised thinking; (iv) altered level of consciousness. Delirium is screened positive if (i) AND (ii) are present, PLUS either (iii) OR (iv). Sensitivity 94%, specificity 89%, with high inter-rater reliability.

8.

Testing inattention at the bedside: months of the year backwards, days of the week backwards, digit span 3 or 4 backwards; or simply observe that the patient is distracted or cannot follow the conversation.

9.

Testing disorganised thinking: orientation to time and place, and observing an illogical flow of ideas.

10.

3D-CAM — a structured 3-minute interview with scripted questions. In patients with dementia: sensitivity 96%, specificity 86%. In patients without dementia: sensitivity 93%, specificity 96%.

11.

Ultra-brief screens: the single best item is "months of the year backwards" (sensitivity 83%, specificity 69%); the best two-item screen is "months of the year backwards" + "what is the day of the week?" (sensitivity 93%, specificity 64%).

12.

CAM-ICU — for intubated or non-verbal patients. Inattention is tested with the letter task ("squeeze my hand every time you hear the letter A" → SAVEAHAART); altered consciousness is any RASS score other than 0; disorganised thinking uses yes/no questions ("will a stone float on water?").

13.

Screening for delirium superimposed on dementia (DSD): best single item = "What day of the week is it?"; best two items = days of the week backwards + day of the week; best three items add "What type of place is this?" and "Does the patient appear sleepy?". Sensitivities are high (84%, 93%, 94%) but specificities low (41%, 30%, 42%) — so a negative screen helps rule out delirium, but a positive screen needs fuller evaluation.

14.

Other validated tools named in Pathy: SPMSQ, Delirium Rating Scale and DRS-R-98, Delirium Symptom Interview, Delirium Assessment Scale, Cognitive Test for Delirium, NEECHAM Confusion Scale, Confusional State Evaluation, Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale, Delirium Index, Delirium Severity Scale, Delirium Detection Score, DDT-Pro, bCAM, 4AT, and the Stanford Proxy Test for Delirium. Prediction tools: E-PRE-DELIRIC and Stanford's Algorithm for Predicting Delirium (SAPD).

D. Frequency and clinical rules

15.

Screening frequency: hospitalised patients at least daily; post-acute care patients weekly; long-term care residents monthly — and at any time a clinician, carer or relative reports a change from baseline.

16.

Never explain away a positive item. Do not attribute a failed test to being in hospital, being unwell, being old, having just had analgesia, or having slept badly — sleep disturbance is itself part of delirium.

17.

When in doubt, assume delirium. If collateral history is unavailable or the patient is too drowsy to complete an interview, delirium should be presumed until proven otherwise because the adverse outcomes are so severe.

18.

After a positive screen, proceed to a comprehensive medical evaluation — full history including collateral and drug history, examination, targeted investigations, and systematic review of every predisposing and precipitating factor in the DELIRIUM IS VERY PAINFUL table. Neuroimaging, LP and EEG only on specific indication.

Table 3. Choosing a tool

Tool Time Best used for Performance / note

CAM ~5 min General ward, the reference screen Sens 94%, Spec 89%; needs the 4-feature algorithm 3D-CAM 3 min Structured ward screening, including Sens 93–96%, Spec 86–96% dementia 4AT <2 min Ward and emergency department; needs NICE- and SIGN-endorsed; works in drowsy patients no training UB-2 <1 min Very rapid triage screen Sens 93%, Spec 64% — rule-out only CAM-ICU 2–3 min Intubated / non-verbal ICU patients Uses RASS + letter A task MDAS / DRS-R-98 10–20 min Grading severity and monitoring Research and palliative care settings response E-PRE-DELIRIC — Prediction of who will become delirious Used to target preventive resources Latest Updates (2023–Present)

NICE CG103 (January 2023) issued new recommendations specifically on assessing and diagnosing delirium, and the 4AT is now the recommended short assessment tool in both NICE and SIGN guidance — a shift from CAM-only teaching.

APA 2025 guideline recommends systematic screening of at-risk patients with a validated tool rather than clinical impression alone, and adds assessment at transitions of care, including before discharge, as a distinct requirement. A recurring criticism in the 2025 literature is that the new guideline still does not mandate a standardised pre-discharge delirium assessment, despite evidence that a large proportion of patients leave hospital still delirious — a useful discussion point in a viva.

Diagnostic label drift: commentary accompanying the APA guideline notes that delirium is systematically under-coded and preferentially recorded as "toxic or metabolic encephalopathy" for reimbursement reasons — a reason why administrative data underestimate its true burden.

ICD-11 has replaced ICD-10 in progressive international rollout; delirium remains a neurocognitive disorder with essentially the same core features (disturbed attention, awareness and cognition with acute onset and fluctuation). Indian data continue to show a wide gap between referral-detected delirium (around 0.4% of inpatients) and screening-detected delirium (around 30% of elderly ICU patients, ~45% of these hypoactive) — the strongest possible argument for routine tool-based screening rather than waiting for a referral.

Current Practice Update

Issue Pathy 6th edition Current practice

Preferred rapid tool CAM family emphasised; 4AT listed among many 4AT recommended by NICE and SIGN for routine ward and ED screening Diagnostic standard DSM-5 and ICD-10 DSM-5 remains; ICD-11 replacing ICD-10 in coding Screening timing Daily in hospital, weekly post-acute, monthly in LTC Unchanged, plus explicit assessment at care transitions and before discharge Severity measurement Several severity scales listed Greater emphasis on tracking severity and trajectory, not just presence or absence Under-diagnosis Acknowledged Now attributed partly to coding practice as well as clinical oversight Exam One-Liners — Q4 Screening ≠ diagnosis. CAM/4AT screen; DSM-5 / ICD-10 diagnose.

CAM = (1 AND 2) PLUS (3 OR 4).

CAM sens 94%, spec 89%; 3D-CAM takes 3 minutes.

Best single bedside item = months of the year backwards.

CAM-ICU uses RASS and the SAVEAHAART letter task.

Screen daily in hospital, weekly post-acute, monthly in long-term care.

Never make excuses for a positive item.

In doubt — assume delirium until proven otherwise.

DSD screens are sensitive but not specific — good for ruling out.

Hypoactive delirium is the commonest and the most missed.

How was your recall?

Rating marks the question complete. “Need another pass” also adds it to your bookmarks.

References

Spotted an error or something out of date?Report a problem with this page