GeriQBank · Paper II · Q8
Palliative management of malignant bowel obstruction
- Chapter
- Part I — Gastroenterology — Luminal Disease
- Years asked
- Not recorded in the source
- Frequency
- No university frequency data for this paper yet
Answer framework
- 1. Definition and context — obstruction beyond Treitz with known malignancy; ovarian and colorectal; prognosis
- 2. Clinical features and CT assessment
- 3. Decision-making — MDT, performance status, wishes; surgery or stent only for selected single-level obstruction
- 4. Drug therapy — parenteral analgesia, antispasmodic, antiemetics (no metoclopramide in complete obstruction); octreotide, dexamethasone, acid suppression
- 5. Supportive measures — venting tubes, hydration, mouth care, PN selection, palliative care; update — ASCO 2024 and S1316
An exam answer plan drawn from the detailed answer below. Use it to attempt the question first.
Detailed answer
Pro · free in betaAttempt it firstOutline your answer as a 7-mark answer before revealing it — definition, causes, evaluation, management and the geriatric angle.Reveal answer
Short revision answer
- Malignant bowel obstruction is mechanical or functional obstruction beyond the ligament of Treitz in known abdominal or pelvic cancer — commonest in ovarian and colorectal cancer (10–28% of colorectal cancers), often multi-level from peritoneal carcinomatosis, with median survival of weeks to a few months if inoperable.
- Colicky and continuous pain, vomiting (early and bilious if proximal, late and faeculent if distal), distension, absolute constipation; contrast CT defines level, cause, number of sites and ischaemia.
- MDT decision weighing performance status, prognosis, nutrition, disease extent and wishes; surgery or stenting only for single-level obstruction with good performance status and no ascites or carcinomatosis — self-expanding metal stent preferred for single left colonic or gastroduodenal obstruction.
- Give drugs subcutaneously or parenterally: morphine infusion (renally adjusted, or fentanyl) with hyoscine butylbromide 60–120 mg/24 h for colic; haloperidol 1.5–3 mg/24 h for vomiting in complete obstruction; metoclopramide 30–60 mg/24 h only in incomplete or functional obstruction (contraindicated in complete — colic, perforation).
- Octreotide 300–600 µg/24 h SC cuts secretions and vomiting within 24–48 hours (better than hyoscine); dexamethasone 6–16 mg/24 h may relieve oedema-related obstruction (stop if no response by 5 days); add a PPI or H2 blocker.
- Venting NG tube short term only; venting gastrostomy for irreversible obstruction so the patient can eat and drink for pleasure; modest SC hydration 500–1000 mL/24 h (over-hydration worsens secretions); mouth care for thirst; PN only if prognosis exceeds 2–3 months; early palliative care with advance care planning and family communication.
- Update — ASCO palliative care 2024 and S1316: "triple therapy" (dexamethasone + octreotide + antiemetic) is the standard medical regimen; surgery improved symptom scores but not survival and caused more complications (15% vs 4%) — reserve it for selected patients after shared decision-making.
Condensed by GeriClinics from the detailed answer below, with no new facts added.
Answer — Textbook Core (6 points)
Definition and context. Mechanical or functional obstruction distal to the ligament of Treitz in a patient with known intra-abdominal or pelvic malignancy. It is commonest in ovarian and colorectal cancer (10–28% of colorectal cancers), is frequently multi-level due to peritoneal carcinomatosis, and carries a median survival of only weeks to a few months when inoperable.
Clinical features and assessment. Colicky and continuous abdominal pain, vomiting (early and bilious if proximal, late and faeculent if distal), distension and absolute constipation. Contrast CT abdomen is the investigation of choice to define the level, cause, whether there are single or multiple sites, and whether ischaemia is present.
Decision-making. Multidisciplinary assessment of performance status, prognosis, nutrition, disease extent and the patient's own wishes. Surgery or stenting is appropriate only for a single-level obstruction in a patient with good performance status, without ascites or carcinomatosis. A self-expanding metallic stent is preferred for a single left-sided colonic or gastroduodenal obstruction.
Drug therapy — analgesia and antiemesis. All drugs must be given subcutaneously or parenterally because oral absorption is unreliable. Use a subcutaneous morphine infusion (renally adjusted, or fentanyl in renal impairment) with hyoscine butylbromide 60–120 mg/24 h for colic. For antiemesis, haloperidol 1.5–3 mg/24 h in complete obstruction; metoclopramide 30–60 mg/24 h only in incomplete or functional obstruction — it is contraindicated in complete obstruction because it precipitates colic and perforation.
Antisecretory and anti-inflammatory therapy. Octreotide 300–600 µg/24 h subcutaneously reduces gastrointestinal secretions and vomiting within 24–48 hours and is more effective than hyoscine butylbromide. Dexamethasone 6–16 mg/24 h may resolve the obstruction by reducing peritumoural and bowel wall oedema — stop it if there is no response within 5 days. Add a proton pump inhibitor or H blocker to reduce gastric 2 secretion volume.
Supportive and non-drug measures. A venting nasogastric tube for short-term relief only; a venting gastrostomy (PEG) for irreversible obstruction so the patient may eat and drink for pleasure; judicious hydration of 500–1000 mL/24 h subcutaneously (over-hydration worsens secretions and vomiting); meticulous mouth care for thirst; parenteral nutrition only in selected patients with a prognosis beyond 2–3 months; and early palliative care referral with advance care planning and family communication.
Latest Update (2023–2026) — 1 point
ASCO Palliative Care Guideline Update 2024 (J Clin Oncol 2024;42:2336) together with the S1316 trial confirm that "triple therapy" — dexamethasone plus octreotide plus an antiemetic — is the standard non-surgical medical regimen, and that although surgery gives better symptom scores on the MDASI-GI instrument, it offers no survival advantage and causes more treatment-related complications (15% vs 4%). Surgery should therefore be reserved for carefully selected patients after shared decision-making.
How was your recall?
Rating marks the question complete. “Need another pass” also adds it to your bookmarks.
References
- PAPERS-2-3-4_COMBINED.pdf — page 11
- GeriQBank source PDF — p. 11
Spotted an error or something out of date?Report a problem with this page